Course Evaluation | Stance Control Orthoses

Profession Type (please choose all that apply): *
Course Assessment *
 Strongly AgreeAgreeUndecided or N/ADisagreeStrongly Disagree
Scientific evidence was provided to substantiate course content
Information presented will be useful in my healthcare career
Information was presented free from commercial bias
Technology was user-friendly & appropriate to support participant learning (if applicable)
Quality of the physical facilities was conducive to learning
Speaker Assessment *
 Strongly AgreeAgreeUndecided or N/ADisagreeStrongly Disagree
The speaker was professional and knowledgeable on course content
The speaker was qualified and held my interest
The speaker was timely and organized
Course Objectives Assessment
The course has met the below learning objectives, and I am now able to: *
 Strongly AgreeAgreeUndecidedDisagreeStrongly Disagree
Describe the mechanical and functional advantages of stance control knee orthoses
Compare and contrast the clinical indications and contraindications for stance control orthoses
Compare and contrast functional characteristics of a locked knee KAFO to a stance control orthosis
Identify a variety of gait deviations that locked knee KAFOs may induce for the user
Compare functional attributes Fillaver SPL, Becker UTX, Otto Bock Freewalk and Horton Stance
Self-Assessment Tool: How confident were you in your knowledge? *
 Very ConfidentFairly ConfidentSomewhat ConfidentNot Confident
Before the course?
After the course?
How likely would you be to recommend Hanger Clinic’s Continuing Education Program to a colleague or friend? *