Virtual Classroom Course Evaluation

Thank you for taking part in our Virtual Classroom course. Please complete the below course evaluation, and you will be taken to the next step in the process if you would like to receive credits.

Profession Type (please choose all that apply): *
Course Assessment *
 Strongly AgreeAgreeUndecided or N/ADisagreeStrongly Disagree
Information presented will be useful in my healthcare career
Technology was user-friendly & appropriate to support participant learning (if applicable)
Speaker Assessment - Anne Grady *
 Strongly AgreeAgreeUndecided or N/ADisagreeStrongly Disagree
The speaker was professional and knowledgeable on course content
The speaker was qualified and held my interest
The speaker was timely and organized
Speaker Assessment - Shane Wurdeman, PhD, CPO *
 Strongly AgreeAgreeUndecided or N/ADisagreeStrongly Disagree
The speaker was professional and knowledgeable on course content
The speaker was qualified and held my interest
The speaker was timely and organized
Speaker Assessment - Jillian Okimoto, CPO *
 Strongly AgreeAgreeUndecided or N/ADisagreeStrongly Disagree
The speaker was professional and knowledgeable on course content
The speaker was qualified and held my interest
The speaker was timely and organized
Speaker Assessment - Jason Macedonia, L/CPO *
 Strongly AgreeAgreeUndecided or N/ADisagreeStrongly Disagree
The speaker was professional and knowledgeable on course content
The speaker was qualified and held my interest
The speaker was timely and organized
Speaker Assessment - Leslie Green, MA, MA, MA, MA, MSW, EdS *
 Strongly AgreeAgreeUndecided or N/ADisagreeStrongly Disagree
The speaker was professional and knowledgeable on course content
The speaker was qualified and held my interest
The speaker was timely and organized
Speaker Assessment - Michelle Denning, PT, MHSA *
 Strongly AgreeAgreeUndecided or N/ADisagreeStrongly Disagree
The speaker was professional and knowledgeable on course content
The speaker was qualified and held my interest
The speaker was timely and organized
Speaker Assessment - Megan Andrew, PT, DPT *
 Strongly AgreeAgreeUndecided or N/ADisagreeStrongly Disagree
The speaker was professional and knowledgeable on course content
The speaker was qualified and held my interest
The speaker was timely and organized
Speaker Assessment - Katherine Hill, OT *
 Strongly AgreeAgreeUndecided or N/ADisagreeStrongly Disagree
The speaker was professional and knowledgeable on course content
The speaker was qualified and held my interest
The speaker was timely and organized
Speaker Assessment - Richard Bailey, CPO, RN *
 Strongly AgreeAgreeUndecided or N/ADisagreeStrongly Disagree
The speaker was professional and knowledgeable on course content
The speaker was qualified and held my interest
The speaker was timely and organized
Speaker Assessment - Michele Ahern, PT *
 Strongly AgreeAgreeUndecided or N/ADisagreeStrongly Disagree
The speaker was professional and knowledgeable on course content
The speaker was qualified and held my interest
The speaker was timely and organized
Speaker Assessment - Drew Schieber, CPO *
 Strongly AgreeAgreeUndecided or N/ADisagreeStrongly Disagree
The speaker was professional and knowledgeable on course content
The speaker was qualified and held my interest
The speaker was timely and organized
Speaker Assessment - Phil Stevens, Med, CPO, FAAOP *
 Strongly AgreeAgreeUndecided or N/ADisagreeStrongly Disagree
The speaker was professional and knowledgeable on course content
The speaker was qualified and held my interest
The speaker was timely and organized
Speaker Assessment - Gwen Blunk Ansier, CO *
 Strongly AgreeAgreeUndecided or N/ADisagreeStrongly Disagree
The speaker was professional and knowledgeable on course content
The speaker was qualified and held my interest
The speaker was timely and organized
Speaker Assessment - Tom DiBello, L/CO, FAAOP *
 Strongly AgreeAgreeUndecided or N/ADisagreeStrongly Disagree
The speaker was professional and knowledgeable on course content
The speaker was qualified and held my interest
The speaker was timely and organized
Course Objective Assessment - PowerUp: Resilience Reset
The course has met the below learning objectives and I am now able to: *
 Strongly AgreeAgreeUndecided or N/ADisagreeStrongly Disagree
Shift the way your brain responds to stress
Identify and overcome self-limiting stories that sabotage your success
Develop a toolbox full of resilience-building skills
Build a culture of team resilience
Utilize mindfulness to reset your nervous system
Course Objective Assessment - Prosthetic Research and the Impact on Patient Outcomes: A Journey Begins with One Step
The course has met the below learning objectives and I am now able to: *
 Strongly AgreeAgreeUndecided or N/ADisagreeStrongly Disagree
Recognize the correlation among patients’ prosthetic rehabilitation and high levels of Quality of Life, (QOL), Patient Satisfaction (Sat), and sustained mobility
Demonstrate how comorbidities may impact prosthetic mobility
Identify how advanced technology can significantly reduce the odds of incurring an injurious fall for individuals with diabetic/dysvascular amputation
Relate the impact of fall risk/prevalence on mobility, QOL, Sat and Healthcare costs
Comprehend the impact of time to delivery of prosthesis on Healthcare Costs and Injurious Fall risk in the first 12 months post-op recovery period
Appreciate how current coverage decisions and documentation considerations may impact prosthetic componentry selection
Course Objective Assessment - Pediatric Symposium 2022 
The course has met the below learning objectives and I am now able to: *
 Strongly AgreeAgreeUndecided or N/ADisagreeStrongly Disagree
Identify upper extremity intervention for improvement of functional range of motion
Assess the goals of each patients Static vs Dynamic vs Stretching
Discuss pros and cons of serial casting, including time commitment, gait mechanics, skin integrity, tone/spasticity
Analyze what serial casting achieves from an orthotic standpoint and explain what those devices provide functionally
Recognize the importance of an interdisciplinary team in addressing upper extremity function
Describe occupational therapy interventions utilized for the pediatric neuro patient
Evaluate the role of splinting as a therapeutic tool to address occupational therapy upper extremity goals
Course Objective Assessment - Pediatric Prosthetics: Beyond the Basics  
The course has met the below learning objectives and I am now able to: *
 Strongly AgreeAgreeUndecided or N/ADisagreeStrongly Disagree
Assess rehabilitation goals as children reach developmental milestones
Identify etiology/causes of pediatric amputation
List basic prosthetic terminology and componentry to better communicate with others on the child’s care team
Analyze documentation needs to meet the goals of the patient
List optimal ways to collaborate with others on the care team, to provide follow-up and reassessment as needed
Course Objective Assessment - Pediatric Prosthetics: Optimizing Prosthetic Design to Improve Patient Outcomes
The course has met the below learning objectives and I am now able to: *
 Strongly AgreeAgreeUndecided or N/ADisagreeStrongly Disagree
List basic componentry and the considerations when developing a care plan for the pediatric prosthetic amputee
List steps for an optimal prosthetic evaluation process and its function in prosthetic design
Identify various types of running blades/sport specific design prosthetics
OASIS 2: Mobility Differences with Specific Prosthetic Feet Across Procedure Codes
The course has met the below learning objectives and I am now able to: *
 Strongly AgreeAgreeUndecided or N/ADisagreeStrongly Disagree
Compare the impact on patient’s mobility when using L5981 versus L5987 componentry as described in recently published research results;
Demonstrate how objective data from large study samples can inform clinical decision making better than relying on specific biomechanical features;
Evaluate concerns and preconceptions that may lead clinicians to choose specific technology;
Assess and compare K3 level options to optimize patients’ mobility and quality of life.
Pediatric Orthotics: Providing Optimal Care for Patients with Cerebral Palsy
The course has met the below learning objectives and I am now able to: *
 Strongly AgreeAgreeUndecided or N/ADisagreeStrongly Disagree
List the patient evaluation process for children with CP and lower limb orthotic intervention;
Set expectations and make key decisions for optimal rehabilitation plans;
Describing the casting, fabrication, fitting and tuning process;
Analyze cases and propose optimal care plans based on patient presentation.
Self-Assessment Tool: How confident were you in your knowledge? *
 Very ConfidentFairly ConfidentSomewhat ConfidentNot Confident
Before the course?
After the course?
Do you work closely with a prosthetist/orthotist?
What is your preferred method of communication with your orthotist or prosthetist with whom you work?
How likely would you be to recommend the Hanger Institute's Virtual Classroom to a colleague or friend? *